All Posts in Category: Blog

Was Jesus a stone by which the Creator took two corrupt birds down?

No one understands the foreign policy of the moody Creator of humans, or when he will or will not intervene. Therefore, no one can say for sure, when He will send an enlightened one to put an end to the religious institutions of Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. And no one can say for sure when He – in order reduce the population of stupid people – will hit with a meteor election rallies where politicians, like Donald Trump, are speaking surrounded by fans. These are wishes many people want to become reality. But, what we can be sure of is that every time the Creator intervened in human society, there was something very repulsive going on inside society. I will quickly mention two occasions where the Creator did intervene in human society. The first was about three thousand years ago, in a community populated by both Egyptians and Israelites.

It’s hard to say how disgusting the lives led by the Israelites and the Egyptians had become or how corrupt their respective religious institutions were. But the fact that a man called Moses decided – after a long search for an answer as to whether he should stand with the Israelites or the Egyptians – that leaving his home country was the only honest answer he had, leads us to see it was a catastrophe.

Imagine that people who lived in other nations were aware how difficult the situation was in ancient Egypt. After Moses had left home, he told his story to a man in the city to which he had immigrated. Moses asked that man, “Do you think I made the correct decision, or I am nothing more than a reckless coward who ran away?” The man replied, “There is no doubt that you made the right choice. Egyptians and Israelites are disgusting, and disgusting people do not accept anything that does not please their egos. Moses, do not think that you can solve the problems at home. These are problems no one but the Creator of human beings can solve.”

One should ask these questions about Moses’s departure: Did Moses’s departure not harm the reputation of the ruling elite? Why did the elite not convince Moses to stay and help them rectify the community? The role of the ruling elite in such a community is to solve problematic situations, right? Well, unfortunately, the ruling elite was part of the problem. Although we cannot say how disgusting the ruling elite in ancient Egypt was, what we can be sure of is that it was not less despicable than the Republicans in the US. Rather than staying an equal distance from the Egyptians and Israelites as real leaders do, and rather than demanding a commitment to the golden rule of compassion from their religious institutions, the Pharaoh exploited the ignorance of both of the religious houses whose product was no different from the product of most churches and mosques in the US (ignorant and arrogant citizens.)

To summarize, what was wrong within ancient Egypt was not only that it consisted of two disgusting groups that had difficulty living together in harmony, the Egyptians and the Israelites, but also it was about how the ruling elite handled the situation. The way the ruling elite handled the situation made living in harmony an even bigger challenge.

The first thing the Creator asked Moses to do was to go back to his home, to remind the Pharaoh about the need to stop using the ignorance and arrogance of both religions. Otherwise, the Israelites would have to leave Egypt. The Pharaoh refused because he considered Moses’s request to be political suicide.

The second occasion that I will mention was about two thousand years ago when the Creator announced what could be regarded as a state of emergency, in which He forced a girl called Mary to bear a child without human intervention, and in which He informed Zechariah that he would be having a baby boy.

From my perspective, the Creator’s second intervention was entirely unjustified and out of touch. What in the world could have been His justification? The Jews, who are His people and the apple of His eye, were living a wonderful monotheistic life at this time? It is true that the Jewish Caliphate, or what was known as the “kingdom of David” or “kingdom of God” was no longer alive, but everything was under control. Meaning, the Jewish zealots were taking care of this problem the same way the Islamic zealots are taking care of the issue of returning the Islamic Caliphate to life. The Jewish zealots were fighting, slaughtering and terrifying evil gentiles and whoever was not to their liking. Just as Islamic zealots are fighting, murdering and terrorizing  civilian French, Spaniards, Japanese, Americans and whoever is not to their liking to return the Islamic Caliphate.

Something else that makes the Creator’s second intervention totally out of touch is that most of the rabbis back then were sure that Judaism and Moses’s laws would dominate the Roman Empire and the flag of Judaism will fly over the emperor’s palace, so why did the Creator not wait? It was a question of time from the rabbis’ perspective. You can say the rabbis were as optimistic as some of the Islamic imams who believe that Islam and sharia law will dominate the world and the flag of Islam will fly over the White House. (Watch the bellow video from 1:50.)

I will digress and say that in a recent opinion poll conducted in Germany, people were asked, “Would you vote for Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi (the head of ISIS) or Ali Khamenei (The supreme leader of Iran) if one of them ran for president against Angelina Merkel in the next election?” 90% of the answers were without hesitation “Definitely; we would vote for them.” In fact, all non-Muslims in the world realize, after they had seen heads without bodies and soldiers moving from Iran to protect a tyrant in Syria, what a rational religion Islam is, and how awesome sharia law is. Touch wood, dear reader – Please.

Anyhow, I do not need to tell you that the story of the opinion poll was a joke. It is true that Islam was an inspiring religion, but it is now, with great regret, just opium from which fools get joy. Having mentioned fools, I would like to confirm that I am not one of those who buys into what the pastors say about the justification of the intervention of the Creator two thousand years ago. I believe the Creator did not come down to earth on what can be considered a suicide mission just because someone had eaten fruit in a garden. He is wiser than that.

I think the number of atheists emerging from Christian families will continue to increase if clergymen do not come up with a logical explanation for the Creator’s intervention. The explanation of “He came down to die on a cross because He loves you,” is emotional rather than logical. I wonder how people find spiritual joy going to the churches and listening to the nonsense of the pastors.

Nevertheless, the question has not been answered yet. And, here I am repeating it, but in a different way. If the Jews were a monotheistic nation and were taking care of the issue of returning the kingdom of God, why did the Creator intervene? What made Him so disgusted? What made Him announce the state of emergency and recruit two not one – John and Jesus?

In my opinion, the only answer is that two things made the Creator disgusted in the period Zachariah lived. Firstly, due to long years of arrogance practiced by the elite and long years of blind obedience practiced by the public, the Jewish had ended up worshipping a ’Politically Provoked God.’ You can say the case with the Jews back then was similar to the case with Muslims at present.

For simplicity’s sake, I would say that ending up worshipping a ‘Politically Provoked God’ inevitably results from the miserable marriage of arrogant clerics and unprincipled politicians. On the wedding day, the house of the scholars is asked, “Do you accept the house of politicians as your husband forever?” and the home of the politicians, headed by the King, is asked, “Do you take the house of the clerics as your wife forever?” After both houses answer “yes,” a celestial dictatorship supported by God comes to exist.

As a result of that marriage, from the perspective of the public, the King becomes the shadow of the Creator on Earth. I do not know when the story of the celestial dictatorship started with the Jews, but I know when it started with Muslims. It is no secret that 150 years from the death of Muhammad, the Kings of Islam began to take titles such as ’The ruler in the name of God,’ ’The obedient to God,’ and ‘The guided by God.’

No matter how long a dictatorship lasts, in the end, it falls – this is the law of nature and life. I do not know when exactly it fell in regards to the Jews, but I know when it fell in regards to the Muslims. In 1922, the last Islamic ’obedient of God‘ was expelled from Turkey like a dog.

One may think that the collapse of any dictatorship is an end of a sad story and the beginning of a happy one. Well, that is not the case when ’God‘ is the one who had forced it. Unfortunately, the collapse of such a dictatorship is the beginning of another sad story. After the falling, the religious texts the public had viewed as political orders demanding obedience to the King, spontaneously became religious texts that required bringing back the throne of the King.

The worshipping of a ‘Politically Provoked God’ was the first thing that aroused the disgust of the Creator. The second thing that provoked the Creator was worshipping another socially and morally harmful ‘God.’  The Roman Emperor, Augustus, took the minds of the people to the point of issuing a coin showing his face and beside it the phrase “Son of God.” What were the mood and the ethics of the Emperor’s Godfather? Unfortunately, the Godfather of the Emperor was no different to the Godfather whose eye, as the US dollar bill tells us, is watching America from the top of a pyramid. The Godfather of the Emperor was immoral; he did not care about anything except money, power, and how wide the territory his son (Augustus) was controlling.

Although I think there is no need for it, I will remind readers of what life looks like when some fool people – like today’s Muslims – worship a ‘Politically Provoked God’, and another insane people – like the Republicans in the US – worship a land, money, and power hungry God. You see the consequences with your own eyes. Bloodshed and chaos that will not stop unless the Creator intervenes. I wish that, as the Creator used a trick called Jesus to spit on the faces of the religious institutions 2000 years ago, He would use another method to spit on the faces of present day religious organizations. In three years, Jesus was able to turn the tables upside down. It is true it took his followers more than three hundred years, but in the end, a face of a descent peasant, instead of a face of a mean emperor, was on the coins.

Unfortunately, many people do not know why Jesus had to be a fatherless preacher. Also, many of the Republicans in America and all of their priests do not know how to explain a human bombing himself except by saying, “Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, is an evil man and he was Lucifer’s best friend.” Trust me; there were many Gentiles 2000 years ago who believed Moses, the prophet of Judaism, was a bastard. It is hard to explain the stupidity of the Republicans in America except by saying their hearts are sick. They are as disgusting as the Egyptians in ancient Egypt.

I hope this article helps remove any confusion especially as France, and other countries are living sensitive moments right now. Do not misunderstand me, dear reader. I am not fighting Christianity. Was Jesus the Creator incarnate or was Jesus a separate icon? My opinion is that this does not matter, and not one of us can be sure. Moreover, I frankly do not think that the Creator Himself cares very much about that. When one asks me, “do you believe that Jesus was the Creator made human or was he a separate icon?” I reply, “the Creator is welcome whether He is Jesus or Jesus’s emotional father.”

Think of Jesus the way that comforts you. But, it is important not to forget that Jesus, or the purpose of Jesus, was to kill two corrupt birds with one stone, not to handle Adam’s error. We must stop linking Jesus to Adam because it is indeed an insult. Remember not to offend Jesus as the Republicans in America do.

Regards to those churches that teach its visitors to be open-minded. Regards to those Churches that teach it visitors that Jesus was a necessity imposed by circumstances of a period. Whether Adam sinned or not, it was necessary for the Creator to make the Jesus trick to put an end to the absurdity of that era. At the same time, we wish from the Creator, another Jesus to bring a stop to the nonsense in which we live.

Also, do not think that I am fighting Islam. Regards to those mosques that teach its visitors that the God of Muhammad cannot be a Politically Provoked one. The Creator is, as Jesus indirectly told us, wiser and smarter than that. He is more thoughtful than what the ignorant and arrogant think.

Share your ideas.

shutterstock_281695595

How Do the Democrats Silence the Republicans Forever?

Introduction.

I still remember the look on the face of Mr. Omar, the language teacher, directed at my classmate, Seleem, and me as he was reading the speech written by Seleem and reviewed by me. Seleem was supposed to deliver the speech to students through the morning school broadcasting. The speech was concerning a massacre that occurred two days earlier in the occupied Palestinian territories where an Israeli citizen shot a number of Muslims as they were praying.

“What is this, Seleem? Why did you use the phrase “villainous Jew” to refer to the person who committed this massacre?” asked Mr. Omar. Then, he looked at me and asked, “Have you reviewed the speech, Mohammed?”

I told my teacher that I had reviewed it. Seleem asked, “And why not, sir? Was it not a Jew who committed the massacre?”

Mr. Omar replied, “Yes.”

Seleem was supposed to deliver the speech half an hour later. Mr. Omar asked him to replace the phrase “villainous Jew” with “villainous settler”; otherwise Seleem would not be allowed to deliver the speech. Seleem complied with the teacher’s request, but he said to Mr. Omar jokingly, “I feel that what you’ve done is the definition of dictatorship. As long as the perpetrator of the massacre is a Jew, you do not have the right to impose changing the phrase. If I were you, I would be ashamed of myself.”

Mr. Omar smiled, before looking at us with a sharp look and saying, “Really? We will see who is supposed to feel ashamed of oneself at today’s session.”

The fourth session of that day was the language class. The first thing Mr. Omar did after entering the classroom was greeting us and informing the rest of the students about what happened between him, me and Seleem in the morning. Mr. Omar said to all students that he would apologize to Seleem and me if the result of a secret vote, which will be done at the end of the period, was to our benefit. Then, Mr. Omar said to Seleem and me, “Are you ready for the challenge, naïve ones.”

I said to my teacher, “I’m ready. I can win the vote easily.”

Mr. Omar looked at Seleem and asked him, “Are you ready?”

Seleem replied, “Give me a moment, sir. I will ask Mohammed about something.”

Seleem whispered in my ear, “Have you lost your mind, Mohammed? You know that typing the phrase “villainous Jew” was an accidental mistake. It is better to apologize to our teacher for describing him as a dictator.”

I responded, “Seleem, there is great hope to win the vote.”

“On what do you rely?” Seleem asked me.

I answered, “On the stupidity of our classmates. Do not worry; I know how to handle this debate. Do not think Mr. Omar takes it so personally. He wants to ignite the matters and create an atmosphere of challenge in the classroom making the students attracted to the lesson. In other words, we do him a favor if we accept the challenge.”

“The challenge is accepted, Mr. Omar. Bring it on,” Seleem said.

“And prepare yourself for an apology, Mr. Omar. You are a dictator and a delusional who distorts facts. You will not escape what you did this morning,” I said to my teacher.

The debate was hot; it could be likened to the present debate between the Democrats and the Republicans in America. Mr. Omar said that we should align ourselves with the vast majority of Jews who denounce violence. Mr. Omar used other arguments in order to back his position. For instance, he stated that as long as the person who committed this heinous deed wasn’t the official spokesman of Judaism, it is not right for us to use the phrase “villainous Jew”. Also, Mr. Omar stated that it is not permissible at all, from a moral point of view, to relate a religion, any religion, with someone who committed a bad deed. My teacher stated that such association makes the religion look like it was the problem and hardens the hearts of believers from different religions against each other.

I began my talk by stating that I have many Jewish and Americans friends and they are good people. I asked my classmates not to misunderstand me. Then, I stated the following:

  1. It is a joke to state that most Jews denounce violence.
  2. There is a problem in Judaism and the world would definitely be better without this inferior religion.
  3. We should admit that there is a problem in Judaism rather than cloak it.
  4. Judaism is the religion where the Creator is nothing more than a real estate buff and celestial whore rather than a respect-worthy super being.
  5. Because Goldstien is a U.S citizen, we must ban all Jewish Americans from entering the country until we figure out what the hell is going on .

In order to weaken my classmate’s confidence in our teacher, I indirectly accused him of being a person who expresses the pulse of the official power, rather than the pulse of the people; and it was likely that Mr. Omar is a Satanist.

However, in spite of all my attempts to influence the students, the teacher managed to win the vote and emerge victorious. That was, according to my assessment, for the sole reason that the teacher had an alternative name in his quiver. If the debate between me and the teacher was about whether to use the adjective “villainous” only, or whether it should be associated with the name “Jew” so that the phrase became “villainous Jew”, there was no doubt that I would win the vote. But, as the teacher had a name other than “Jew” in his quiver to associate with the adjective “villainous”, he managed to win the vote.

All students voted in favor of the use of the phrase “villainous settler”. The funny thing was that even Seleem did not vote for me. When I told him off, Seleem said to me, “Oh man … you’re an extremely dirty person. I hated you as you were trying to affect the rest of the students; and you made me sympathetic to the Jews.”

The concern:

Republicans, and those who support the global movement of demonizing Islam and Muslims from all around the world, have begun targeting groups that always have been known loyal to the Democrats. They are using emotional tricks similar to the tricks I used hoping to win the vote against my so human and moral teacher.

The situation before the Orlando attacks is different from the situation after the Orlando attacks, and we, peace loving and moral people in the world, should be vigilant. There is a possibility that the Democrat, who will run for president, could lose this election to Donald Trump if the Democrat Party continues to refrain from pairing the adjective “extremist” or “villainous” with a name when pointing at the executors of the terrorist attacks in America.

U.S. citizens are some of the most naive people on earth, and it is very easy to deceive them. Sorry for being direct, but that is the truth. Four years ago, I was sitting at a table next to two ladies in a restaurant in Toronto. One of the ladies was audibly telling the other with amazement about an 18-year-old U.S. citizen who asked her where Canada was. The distance between the place where this 18-year-old grew up and the southern border of Canada is only 150-km. Imagine now if that incurious 18-year-old citizen, who is now 22 years old, is a homosexual, or sympathetic to homosexuals, and he normally gives his vote to the Democrats in each election. Then, imagine how easy it is for the Republicans to convince him to change his mind after the Orlando attacks through their media. I left below four videos that will help you understand the situation after the Orlando attacks.

This is a video of a reporter who seems to support demonizing Islam and Muslims.

This is a video of a faithful Republican. Some people say that faithful Republicans, such as Pat Robertson, are one of the reasons why people stop believing in God in America.

This is a video of a gentleman whom some people claim supports the villainous settlers in Israel.

This is a video of Mr. Know It All who believes a Christian hugging a Muslim is not good idea. ( Watch the video at 1:29)

 

How can the Democrats prevent the Republicans and their supporters from influencing naive voters?

Democratic politicians must find one label under which all of the executors of terrorist operations will be listed. That label will be the title of the immorality of terrorists.

If the Democrats find that label, they will slap the faces of the Republicans and their supporters the same way my teacher, who listed all immoral Jews under one label, “settlers”, slapped my face. The question now is, is there a common thing between all of the immoral terrorists?

The answer, “Yes” All those terrorists are “projectionists.”

 

Who are the Projectionists?

Projectionists are those who read the book they consider sacred in the present tense form. Reading any sacred book in the present tense leads to projection of that sacred book onto a reality to which it doesn’t belong.

I advise readers to read Abraham: Father of Atheism if they want to expand on this topic. But what you need to know, dear reader, is this:

  1. The immoral act of “projecting” is a crime not only against humans, but also against the God of the sacred book himself as it turns that God to a god with worldly interests or worldly ambitions.
  2. Not only Islam is suffering from the lesion of projection, but also Christianity and Judaism are suffering from this disease. Have you not ever noticed that the God “villainous settlers” in Israel worship is nothing more than a celestial real estate whore? Have you not noticed that the God Republicans worship is nothing more than a celestial gun store owner? All of these are Gods of interests that have nothing to do with the God of Abraham who was a moral God of motivation. Occasionally, the God Republicans worship turns into a celestial assistant to a celestial real estate whore. (Republicans consider it a question of faith supporting “villainous settlers”. From the perspective of Republicans, stopping “villainous settlers” makes their God quite irate: “God has a plan, and stopping settlers will negatively affect his plan,” those who call themselves Zionist Christians say.)

There is a possibility that Donald Trump and the Republican Party will call for the addition of the word “Muslim” to the phrase “villainous projectionist.” If that happens, then there would be no problem as projection is not exclusive to Islam. As I stated earlier, projection is a lesion Christianity and Judaism suffer from. There is nothing wrong with calling the immoral person who perpetrated the Orlando attacks a “villainous Islamic projectionist” the same way it is not wrong calling the “villainous settlers”, “villainous Jewish projectionists”, and the same way it is not wrong calling Republicans, who call themselves Zionist Christians, “villainous Christian settlers supporters”.

I hope that you send this article to the leaders in the Democratic Party. Tell them that the solution of that problem is easier than they imagine. Tell them it’s time that “magic turn against the magician”.

 

Let’s give what Obama called “the sinful tendency” a name.

In a National Prayer Breakfast speech, the President Barack Obama explained his viewpoint by saying, “And lest we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisitions people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ. In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ. So this is not unique to one group or to one religion. There is a tendency in us, a sinful tendency that can pervert and distort our faith.”

Watch this video and see the reaction of a Republican who supports demonizing Islam and Muslims.

I have one reservation on what Mr. Obama said: The tendency is not in us. It is not in all Christians, Muslims and Jews. There are many wonderful Christians out there who never accept turning their God into a celestial bitch. There are many wonderful Muslims who never accept turning their God into a celestial political whore. There are many wonderful Jews who never accept turning their God into a celestial real estate whore. The tendency is only in the villainous among Christians, Muslims and Jews. It is only in the projectionists.

Author Statement: Let’s draw a confident smile on non-believers’ faces

‘This provocative work challenges the religious status quo.” Foreword reviews

“An often cutting work that calls down a plague on the houses of all domineering belief systems.” Kirkus reviews

Dear non-believer,

                               I like the fact that when the infuriating alarm clock yells “Wake up, there’s a challenge waiting for you today”, rousing you from a pleasant dream, you do not smash it. You simply slap the button to shut it up and then head to work. Let’s establish this: Your boss doesn’t care how you view your alarm clock. He or she only cares that you show up at work on time with a wide smile on your face.

Saying, “Scientists have figured it out … There is no god; and there is no need for one,” is common nowadays to counter Christians, Muslims and Jews, who turn up saying, “Wake up, atheist. There’s a challenge waiting for you in the afterlife.” Unfortunately, that common response could be illogical: Ask any scientist, “Is the scientific community sure there is no creator?” and the likely answer will be, “No, we are only about 99 percent positive. Anyone could be wrong, as Richard Dawkins said.”

The previous response makes you a one percent gambler and frames you as defending personal conclusions instead of facts. It makes sense to defend statements such as that DNA decides biological characteristics such as eye and skin color and that chimpanzees are our biological cousins, because these are facts. However, defending the statement “There is no creator” after reading Adam’s story has nothing to do with defending facts. The only fact in the Adam story is that if we have a creator, he paid no attention to science while introducing himself to our ancestors. Instead, he preferred to focus on teaching them how to overcome the challenges of life.

There are atheists who believe in science, but do not use science as the base for their arguments, they say “We do not give a damn when there is no evidence.” Be careful using this kind of reasoning for your argument. It is true that sometimes the problem is that there is no evidence. But sometimes, the problem is that there is no desire to recognize evidence. There is a story about a police officer who released a murderer despite having video of him committing the crime. What was the officer’s rationale for dismissing the evidence you might ask. “It was made by the victim”. Maybe the difference is little between the police officer and those atheists who label the books, in which stories such as the Abraham story and the Mary story were written, as man-made rather than possible evidence, of divine intervention.

The troubling situation, if you allow me to call it so, is easy to solve. Do you remember what we established about your smart boss? Think about it … The creator, if he does exist, should not be less understanding or less open-minded than your boss. So what if you view todays Christians, Muslims and Jews as infuriating alarm clocks? What you should care about is leaving this world with a wide, full-of-confidence smile on your face similar to the smile on the face of a confident employee when he or she says, “Good morning” to their colleagues and boss.

I am aware that you don’t deem books worth reading, unless their titles are such as ‘God Is Not Great’ or ‘God Is So Bad’, but this time I kindly ask you to make an exception. I want to draw that confident smile on your face. Considering the ignorance of contemporary Christians, Muslims and Jews, nothing should be easier than drawing that smile. It is easier than drinking a glass of water.

Always remember that there is one percent probability that a creator does exist. It is not good form for you to look disoriented if the Creator says to you, “Okay, numb-skull, I truly appreciate your refusal to be a Christian, a Muslim or a Jew, but tell me: Why did you think I was less understanding and open-minded than your boss? Have I not made from an atheist a role model for you? What more did you want from me? Also, tell me why you have released me although I left in your hands books in which I admitted committing “crimes” against your kind?”

 

Religious readers are discouraged from proceeding beyond the first few pages, though caustic treats await them throughout if they do. –  Foreword reviews.

 

Abraham Father of Atheism offers Americans a serious, and sincere solution that can help protect their country from terrorist attacks.

Some observers who believe that the vision of the conservative right wing will decide the future of US politics in case Donald Trump wins the 2016 Presidential race, considered Donald Trump’s proposal of banning Muslims from entering the country a new chapter in the encyclopedia of American foolishness. Other observers, on the other hand, supported the proposal as they believed that the ban, which will be temporary until the House of Representatives of the US figure out “what the hell is going on”, will definitely protect the US from terrorist attacks. This is the beauty of democracy; it allows all people to express their opinions. However, the question of the nature of the ban – temporary or permanent – rests on the shoulders of the US House of Representatives: Will they be able to figure out what the hell is going on in the Islamic world, or they will fail? That is a question waiting to be answered in case Donald Trump becomes the next president of the US.

It is unlikely those who do not know the cause of a problem will be able to solve it. That is the reason I believe the US House of Representatives will not be able to figure out “what the hell is going on?”  I stated it in the book, and here I am restating it, hopefully people will understand: Terrorist attacks in America – or elsewhere in the world – will not come to an end until all Muslims admit that the Mutawakkil-supported doctrine concerning the Quran was a violation of the basic tenets of wisdom and logic. Unfortunately, the human race continues to pay the price for this distortion of the Creator’s second glory (after Jesus): the Quran.

Just as early Christians were confused by the fact that Jesus was fatherless, therefore they had to decide whether Jesus was a divinely created son or he was the Creator’s ‘always-existed’ son; early Muslims also faced similar confusion regarding the Quran. They had to decide whether the Quran was a divinely created book, or it was the Creator’s ‘always-existed’ book.

To further simplify; imagine the Quran as if it were a Twitter account. Opening it and reading its 6,236 verses is like logging into that Twitter account to read 6,236 tweets. Early Muslims had to decide whether they should handle this ’Twitter account’ as an active one, or should they handle it as inactive one?

Out of respect to the Creator and to themselves, scholars of reason insisted that the Quran be defined as inactive. Scholars of reason knew that considering the Quran as the Creator’s ‘always-existed’ book means Muslims will end up as naive believers the way Christians ended up. In other words, scholars of reason knew that people will end up as worshipers of a text instead of being inventive freethinkers who worship the god of the text. However, the caliph al-Mutawakkil was as smart and thoughtful as the emperor Constantine; the scholars who objected to his doctrine were persecuted just as Constantine’s detractors had been.

The catastrophe was in considering the Quran a collection of the Creator’s active tweets. In addition to that, al-Mutawakkil and his scholars were able to cleverly force on people another Twitter account under the title of al-Hadith (‘Muhammad’s tweets’) which, by the way, was nothing but putting in the mouth of Muhammad the words that served the agenda, the mood, and the ambition of the caliph and his narrow-minded scholars.

The members of the spiritual service crews (today’s imams and priests), insist on covering up the mistakes their predecessors made, although the consequences of these mistakes are clearly visible.

No one knows when the members of the Islamic spiritual services crew (the imams) will feel little shame. And no one knows when lay Muslims will wake up to rebel against those imams who introduce al-Mutawakkil and his gang as holy men. But it is not fair that people from other countries pay the cost of lay Muslims’ carelessness. That being said, here is what should be done until lay Muslims wake up. I advise not only the embassies of America, but also the embassies of all countries, to include the following question in their visa application form for when a Muslim asks for an entry visa: “Do you, dear Muslim, consider the Quran your ‘God always-existed’ book? Do you, dear Muslim, consider al-Hadith your prophet’s sayings (tweets)?” If they answer “Yes” then that Muslim should not be given a visa – not because they are a terrorist, but rather because they are vulnerable to becoming radicalized (if they are not already). Lay Muslims are not bad people by definition. They, just as lay Christians, need someone to help them, not demonize them.

Even if the solution I suggest could help put an end to the terrorist attacks, American politicians will not consider it and here is why.  The reason is because the capitalists of America will not allow any party to action this plan. Ironically, the al-Mutawakkil-supported doctrine concerning the Quran serves the capitalists in their efforts to control American citizens, serves the capitalists in the pursuit of their interests overseas, just as it serves tyrannical rulers in the Islamic countries!

Remember, dear reader, that no one helped the West force the Soviet Union to leave Afghanistan but al-Mutawakkil’s notion concerning the Quran. I witnessed that period and watched members of the Islamic spiritual service crew while they were spreading their poison: “Hey, people. God is tweeting. Go to Afghanistan and fight in His name.” I know one of the lay Muslims who had been emotionally touched by that deceiving propaganda; he is now a guest in Guantanamo because he violated the set agenda and went one step further in understanding God’s tweets!

The tyrants know very well that although al-Mutawakkil’s notion is a wild beast, it is useful for them when it is tamed according to their interests. Unfortunately, the Quran becomes secretive, sometimes difficult to control, a weapon by which the tyrants, all tyrants, pursue their interests.

George Carlin once said in an interview, “When you are born in this world, you are given a ticket to the freak show. And when you are born in America, you are given a front-row seat.” (Watch the video from minute 2:58) The mission of changing lay believers is extremely tiresome but not impossible. I will try my best while I am holding my notebook as George Carlin did. Whenever I hear about a terrorist attack, I will write in the notebook, “This is the same shame that al-Mutawakkil’s followers had to carry”. I will feel sorry for those whom al-Mutawakkil persecuted, but I will not blame Muhammad!

And whenever I watch the video of Christopher Hitchens while he mocks the morality of Christianity, the Garden of Eden and its famous silly forbidden apple, I will write in my notebook, “This is the same shame that Constantine’s followers had to carry”. I will feel sorry for those whom the emperor Constantine persecuted, but I will not blame the Creator or his son Jesus.