All Posts in Category: Uncategorized

Was Jesus a stone by which the Creator took two corrupt birds down?

No one understands the foreign policy of the moody Creator of humans, or when he will or will not intervene. Therefore, no one can say for sure, when He will send an enlightened one to put an end to the religious institutions of Christianity, Islam, and Judaism. And no one can say for sure when He – in order reduce the population of stupid people – will hit with a meteor election rallies where politicians, like Donald Trump, are speaking surrounded by fans. These are wishes many people want to become reality. But, what we can be sure of is that every time the Creator intervened in human society, there was something very repulsive going on inside society. I will quickly mention two occasions where the Creator did intervene in human society. The first was about three thousand years ago, in a community populated by both Egyptians and Israelites.

It’s hard to say how disgusting the lives led by the Israelites and the Egyptians had become or how corrupt their respective religious institutions were. But the fact that a man called Moses decided – after a long search for an answer as to whether he should stand with the Israelites or the Egyptians – that leaving his home country was the only honest answer he had, leads us to see it was a catastrophe.

Imagine that people who lived in other nations were aware how difficult the situation was in ancient Egypt. After Moses had left home, he told his story to a man in the city to which he had immigrated. Moses asked that man, “Do you think I made the correct decision, or I am nothing more than a reckless coward who ran away?” The man replied, “There is no doubt that you made the right choice. Egyptians and Israelites are disgusting, and disgusting people do not accept anything that does not please their egos. Moses, do not think that you can solve the problems at home. These are problems no one but the Creator of human beings can solve.”

One should ask these questions about Moses’s departure: Did Moses’s departure not harm the reputation of the ruling elite? Why did the elite not convince Moses to stay and help them rectify the community? The role of the ruling elite in such a community is to solve problematic situations, right? Well, unfortunately, the ruling elite was part of the problem. Although we cannot say how disgusting the ruling elite in ancient Egypt was, what we can be sure of is that it was not less despicable than the Republicans in the US. Rather than staying an equal distance from the Egyptians and Israelites as real leaders do, and rather than demanding a commitment to the golden rule of compassion from their religious institutions, the Pharaoh exploited the ignorance of both of the religious houses whose product was no different from the product of most churches and mosques in the US (ignorant and arrogant citizens.)

To summarize, what was wrong within ancient Egypt was not only that it consisted of two disgusting groups that had difficulty living together in harmony, the Egyptians and the Israelites, but also it was about how the ruling elite handled the situation. The way the ruling elite handled the situation made living in harmony an even bigger challenge.

The first thing the Creator asked Moses to do was to go back to his home, to remind the Pharaoh about the need to stop using the ignorance and arrogance of both religions. Otherwise, the Israelites would have to leave Egypt. The Pharaoh refused because he considered Moses’s request to be political suicide.

The second occasion that I will mention was about two thousand years ago when the Creator announced what could be regarded as a state of emergency, in which He forced a girl called Mary to bear a child without human intervention, and in which He informed Zechariah that he would be having a baby boy.

From my perspective, the Creator’s second intervention was entirely unjustified and out of touch. What in the world could have been His justification? The Jews, who are His people and the apple of His eye, were living a wonderful monotheistic life at this time? It is true that the Jewish Caliphate, or what was known as the “kingdom of David” or “kingdom of God” was no longer alive, but everything was under control. Meaning, the Jewish zealots were taking care of this problem the same way the Islamic zealots are taking care of the issue of returning the Islamic Caliphate to life. The Jewish zealots were fighting, slaughtering and terrifying evil gentiles and whoever was not to their liking. Just as Islamic zealots are fighting, murdering and terrorizing  civilian French, Spaniards, Japanese, Americans and whoever is not to their liking to return the Islamic Caliphate.

Something else that makes the Creator’s second intervention totally out of touch is that most of the rabbis back then were sure that Judaism and Moses’s laws would dominate the Roman Empire and the flag of Judaism will fly over the emperor’s palace, so why did the Creator not wait? It was a question of time from the rabbis’ perspective. You can say the rabbis were as optimistic as some of the Islamic imams who believe that Islam and sharia law will dominate the world and the flag of Islam will fly over the White House. (Watch the bellow video from 1:50.)

I will digress and say that in a recent opinion poll conducted in Germany, people were asked, “Would you vote for Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi (the head of ISIS) or Ali Khamenei (The supreme leader of Iran) if one of them ran for president against Angelina Merkel in the next election?” 90% of the answers were without hesitation “Definitely; we would vote for them.” In fact, all non-Muslims in the world realize, after they had seen heads without bodies and soldiers moving from Iran to protect a tyrant in Syria, what a rational religion Islam is, and how awesome sharia law is. Touch wood, dear reader – Please.

Anyhow, I do not need to tell you that the story of the opinion poll was a joke. It is true that Islam was an inspiring religion, but it is now, with great regret, just opium from which fools get joy. Having mentioned fools, I would like to confirm that I am not one of those who buys into what the pastors say about the justification of the intervention of the Creator two thousand years ago. I believe the Creator did not come down to earth on what can be considered a suicide mission just because someone had eaten fruit in a garden. He is wiser than that.

I think the number of atheists emerging from Christian families will continue to increase if clergymen do not come up with a logical explanation for the Creator’s intervention. The explanation of “He came down to die on a cross because He loves you,” is emotional rather than logical. I wonder how people find spiritual joy going to the churches and listening to the nonsense of the pastors.

Nevertheless, the question has not been answered yet. And, here I am repeating it, but in a different way. If the Jews were a monotheistic nation and were taking care of the issue of returning the kingdom of God, why did the Creator intervene? What made Him so disgusted? What made Him announce the state of emergency and recruit two not one – John and Jesus?

In my opinion, the only answer is that two things made the Creator disgusted in the period Zachariah lived. Firstly, due to long years of arrogance practiced by the elite and long years of blind obedience practiced by the public, the Jewish had ended up worshipping a ’Politically Provoked God.’ You can say the case with the Jews back then was similar to the case with Muslims at present.

For simplicity’s sake, I would say that ending up worshipping a ‘Politically Provoked God’ inevitably results from the miserable marriage of arrogant clerics and unprincipled politicians. On the wedding day, the house of the scholars is asked, “Do you accept the house of politicians as your husband forever?” and the home of the politicians, headed by the King, is asked, “Do you take the house of the clerics as your wife forever?” After both houses answer “yes,” a celestial dictatorship supported by God comes to exist.

As a result of that marriage, from the perspective of the public, the King becomes the shadow of the Creator on Earth. I do not know when the story of the celestial dictatorship started with the Jews, but I know when it started with Muslims. It is no secret that 150 years from the death of Muhammad, the Kings of Islam began to take titles such as ’The ruler in the name of God,’ ’The obedient to God,’ and ‘The guided by God.’

No matter how long a dictatorship lasts, in the end, it falls – this is the law of nature and life. I do not know when exactly it fell in regards to the Jews, but I know when it fell in regards to the Muslims. In 1922, the last Islamic ’obedient of God‘ was expelled from Turkey like a dog.

One may think that the collapse of any dictatorship is an end of a sad story and the beginning of a happy one. Well, that is not the case when ’God‘ is the one who had forced it. Unfortunately, the collapse of such a dictatorship is the beginning of another sad story. After the falling, the religious texts the public had viewed as political orders demanding obedience to the King, spontaneously became religious texts that required bringing back the throne of the King.

The worshipping of a ‘Politically Provoked God’ was the first thing that aroused the disgust of the Creator. The second thing that provoked the Creator was worshipping another socially and morally harmful ‘God.’  The Roman Emperor, Augustus, took the minds of the people to the point of issuing a coin showing his face and beside it the phrase “Son of God.” What were the mood and the ethics of the Emperor’s Godfather? Unfortunately, the Godfather of the Emperor was no different to the Godfather whose eye, as the US dollar bill tells us, is watching America from the top of a pyramid. The Godfather of the Emperor was immoral; he did not care about anything except money, power, and how wide the territory his son (Augustus) was controlling.

Although I think there is no need for it, I will remind readers of what life looks like when some fool people – like today’s Muslims – worship a ‘Politically Provoked God’, and another insane people – like the Republicans in the US – worship a land, money, and power hungry God. You see the consequences with your own eyes. Bloodshed and chaos that will not stop unless the Creator intervenes. I wish that, as the Creator used a trick called Jesus to spit on the faces of the religious institutions 2000 years ago, He would use another method to spit on the faces of present day religious organizations. In three years, Jesus was able to turn the tables upside down. It is true it took his followers more than three hundred years, but in the end, a face of a descent peasant, instead of a face of a mean emperor, was on the coins.

Unfortunately, many people do not know why Jesus had to be a fatherless preacher. Also, many of the Republicans in America and all of their priests do not know how to explain a human bombing himself except by saying, “Muhammad, the prophet of Islam, is an evil man and he was Lucifer’s best friend.” Trust me; there were many Gentiles 2000 years ago who believed Moses, the prophet of Judaism, was a bastard. It is hard to explain the stupidity of the Republicans in America except by saying their hearts are sick. They are as disgusting as the Egyptians in ancient Egypt.

I hope this article helps remove any confusion especially as France, and other countries are living sensitive moments right now. Do not misunderstand me, dear reader. I am not fighting Christianity. Was Jesus the Creator incarnate or was Jesus a separate icon? My opinion is that this does not matter, and not one of us can be sure. Moreover, I frankly do not think that the Creator Himself cares very much about that. When one asks me, “do you believe that Jesus was the Creator made human or was he a separate icon?” I reply, “the Creator is welcome whether He is Jesus or Jesus’s emotional father.”

Think of Jesus the way that comforts you. But, it is important not to forget that Jesus, or the purpose of Jesus, was to kill two corrupt birds with one stone, not to handle Adam’s error. We must stop linking Jesus to Adam because it is indeed an insult. Remember not to offend Jesus as the Republicans in America do.

Regards to those churches that teach its visitors to be open-minded. Regards to those Churches that teach it visitors that Jesus was a necessity imposed by circumstances of a period. Whether Adam sinned or not, it was necessary for the Creator to make the Jesus trick to put an end to the absurdity of that era. At the same time, we wish from the Creator, another Jesus to bring a stop to the nonsense in which we live.

Also, do not think that I am fighting Islam. Regards to those mosques that teach its visitors that the God of Muhammad cannot be a Politically Provoked one. The Creator is, as Jesus indirectly told us, wiser and smarter than that. He is more thoughtful than what the ignorant and arrogant think.

Share your ideas.


How Do the Democrats Silence the Republicans Forever?


I still remember the look on the face of Mr. Omar, the language teacher, directed at my classmate, Seleem, and me as he was reading the speech written by Seleem and reviewed by me. Seleem was supposed to deliver the speech to students through the morning school broadcasting. The speech was concerning a massacre that occurred two days earlier in the occupied Palestinian territories where an Israeli citizen shot a number of Muslims as they were praying.

“What is this, Seleem? Why did you use the phrase “villainous Jew” to refer to the person who committed this massacre?” asked Mr. Omar. Then, he looked at me and asked, “Have you reviewed the speech, Mohammed?”

I told my teacher that I had reviewed it. Seleem asked, “And why not, sir? Was it not a Jew who committed the massacre?”

Mr. Omar replied, “Yes.”

Seleem was supposed to deliver the speech half an hour later. Mr. Omar asked him to replace the phrase “villainous Jew” with “villainous settler”; otherwise Seleem would not be allowed to deliver the speech. Seleem complied with the teacher’s request, but he said to Mr. Omar jokingly, “I feel that what you’ve done is the definition of dictatorship. As long as the perpetrator of the massacre is a Jew, you do not have the right to impose changing the phrase. If I were you, I would be ashamed of myself.”

Mr. Omar smiled, before looking at us with a sharp look and saying, “Really? We will see who is supposed to feel ashamed of oneself at today’s session.”

The fourth session of that day was the language class. The first thing Mr. Omar did after entering the classroom was greeting us and informing the rest of the students about what happened between him, me and Seleem in the morning. Mr. Omar said to all students that he would apologize to Seleem and me if the result of a secret vote, which will be done at the end of the period, was to our benefit. Then, Mr. Omar said to Seleem and me, “Are you ready for the challenge, naïve ones.”

I said to my teacher, “I’m ready. I can win the vote easily.”

Mr. Omar looked at Seleem and asked him, “Are you ready?”

Seleem replied, “Give me a moment, sir. I will ask Mohammed about something.”

Seleem whispered in my ear, “Have you lost your mind, Mohammed? You know that typing the phrase “villainous Jew” was an accidental mistake. It is better to apologize to our teacher for describing him as a dictator.”

I responded, “Seleem, there is great hope to win the vote.”

“On what do you rely?” Seleem asked me.

I answered, “On the stupidity of our classmates. Do not worry; I know how to handle this debate. Do not think Mr. Omar takes it so personally. He wants to ignite the matters and create an atmosphere of challenge in the classroom making the students attracted to the lesson. In other words, we do him a favor if we accept the challenge.”

“The challenge is accepted, Mr. Omar. Bring it on,” Seleem said.

“And prepare yourself for an apology, Mr. Omar. You are a dictator and a delusional who distorts facts. You will not escape what you did this morning,” I said to my teacher.

The debate was hot; it could be likened to the present debate between the Democrats and the Republicans in America. Mr. Omar said that we should align ourselves with the vast majority of Jews who denounce violence. Mr. Omar used other arguments in order to back his position. For instance, he stated that as long as the person who committed this heinous deed wasn’t the official spokesman of Judaism, it is not right for us to use the phrase “villainous Jew”. Also, Mr. Omar stated that it is not permissible at all, from a moral point of view, to relate a religion, any religion, with someone who committed a bad deed. My teacher stated that such association makes the religion look like it was the problem and hardens the hearts of believers from different religions against each other.

I began my talk by stating that I have many Jewish and Americans friends and they are good people. I asked my classmates not to misunderstand me. Then, I stated the following:

  1. It is a joke to state that most Jews denounce violence.
  2. There is a problem in Judaism and the world would definitely be better without this inferior religion.
  3. We should admit that there is a problem in Judaism rather than cloak it.
  4. Judaism is the religion where the Creator is nothing more than a real estate buff and celestial whore rather than a respect-worthy super being.
  5. Because Goldstien is a U.S citizen, we must ban all Jewish Americans from entering the country until we figure out what the hell is going on .

In order to weaken my classmate’s confidence in our teacher, I indirectly accused him of being a person who expresses the pulse of the official power, rather than the pulse of the people; and it was likely that Mr. Omar is a Satanist.

However, in spite of all my attempts to influence the students, the teacher managed to win the vote and emerge victorious. That was, according to my assessment, for the sole reason that the teacher had an alternative name in his quiver. If the debate between me and the teacher was about whether to use the adjective “villainous” only, or whether it should be associated with the name “Jew” so that the phrase became “villainous Jew”, there was no doubt that I would win the vote. But, as the teacher had a name other than “Jew” in his quiver to associate with the adjective “villainous”, he managed to win the vote.

All students voted in favor of the use of the phrase “villainous settler”. The funny thing was that even Seleem did not vote for me. When I told him off, Seleem said to me, “Oh man … you’re an extremely dirty person. I hated you as you were trying to affect the rest of the students; and you made me sympathetic to the Jews.”

The concern:

Republicans, and those who support the global movement of demonizing Islam and Muslims from all around the world, have begun targeting groups that always have been known loyal to the Democrats. They are using emotional tricks similar to the tricks I used hoping to win the vote against my so human and moral teacher.

The situation before the Orlando attacks is different from the situation after the Orlando attacks, and we, peace loving and moral people in the world, should be vigilant. There is a possibility that the Democrat, who will run for president, could lose this election to Donald Trump if the Democrat Party continues to refrain from pairing the adjective “extremist” or “villainous” with a name when pointing at the executors of the terrorist attacks in America.

U.S. citizens are some of the most naive people on earth, and it is very easy to deceive them. Sorry for being direct, but that is the truth. Four years ago, I was sitting at a table next to two ladies in a restaurant in Toronto. One of the ladies was audibly telling the other with amazement about an 18-year-old U.S. citizen who asked her where Canada was. The distance between the place where this 18-year-old grew up and the southern border of Canada is only 150-km. Imagine now if that incurious 18-year-old citizen, who is now 22 years old, is a homosexual, or sympathetic to homosexuals, and he normally gives his vote to the Democrats in each election. Then, imagine how easy it is for the Republicans to convince him to change his mind after the Orlando attacks through their media. I left below four videos that will help you understand the situation after the Orlando attacks.

This is a video of a reporter who seems to support demonizing Islam and Muslims.

This is a video of a faithful Republican. Some people say that faithful Republicans, such as Pat Robertson, are one of the reasons why people stop believing in God in America.

This is a video of a gentleman whom some people claim supports the villainous settlers in Israel.

This is a video of Mr. Know It All who believes a Christian hugging a Muslim is not good idea. ( Watch the video at 1:29)


How can the Democrats prevent the Republicans and their supporters from influencing naive voters?

Democratic politicians must find one label under which all of the executors of terrorist operations will be listed. That label will be the title of the immorality of terrorists.

If the Democrats find that label, they will slap the faces of the Republicans and their supporters the same way my teacher, who listed all immoral Jews under one label, “settlers”, slapped my face. The question now is, is there a common thing between all of the immoral terrorists?

The answer, “Yes” All those terrorists are “projectionists.”


Who are the Projectionists?

Projectionists are those who read the book they consider sacred in the present tense form. Reading any sacred book in the present tense leads to projection of that sacred book onto a reality to which it doesn’t belong.

I advise readers to read Abraham: Father of Atheism if they want to expand on this topic. But what you need to know, dear reader, is this:

  1. The immoral act of “projecting” is a crime not only against humans, but also against the God of the sacred book himself as it turns that God to a god with worldly interests or worldly ambitions.
  2. Not only Islam is suffering from the lesion of projection, but also Christianity and Judaism are suffering from this disease. Have you not ever noticed that the God “villainous settlers” in Israel worship is nothing more than a celestial real estate whore? Have you not noticed that the God Republicans worship is nothing more than a celestial gun store owner? All of these are Gods of interests that have nothing to do with the God of Abraham who was a moral God of motivation. Occasionally, the God Republicans worship turns into a celestial assistant to a celestial real estate whore. (Republicans consider it a question of faith supporting “villainous settlers”. From the perspective of Republicans, stopping “villainous settlers” makes their God quite irate: “God has a plan, and stopping settlers will negatively affect his plan,” those who call themselves Zionist Christians say.)

There is a possibility that Donald Trump and the Republican Party will call for the addition of the word “Muslim” to the phrase “villainous projectionist.” If that happens, then there would be no problem as projection is not exclusive to Islam. As I stated earlier, projection is a lesion Christianity and Judaism suffer from. There is nothing wrong with calling the immoral person who perpetrated the Orlando attacks a “villainous Islamic projectionist” the same way it is not wrong calling the “villainous settlers”, “villainous Jewish projectionists”, and the same way it is not wrong calling Republicans, who call themselves Zionist Christians, “villainous Christian settlers supporters”.

I hope that you send this article to the leaders in the Democratic Party. Tell them that the solution of that problem is easier than they imagine. Tell them it’s time that “magic turn against the magician”.


Let’s give what Obama called “the sinful tendency” a name.

In a National Prayer Breakfast speech, the President Barack Obama explained his viewpoint by saying, “And lest we get on our high horse and think this is unique to some other place, remember that during the Crusades and the Inquisitions people committed terrible deeds in the name of Christ. In our home country, slavery and Jim Crow all too often was justified in the name of Christ. So this is not unique to one group or to one religion. There is a tendency in us, a sinful tendency that can pervert and distort our faith.”

Watch this video and see the reaction of a Republican who supports demonizing Islam and Muslims.

I have one reservation on what Mr. Obama said: The tendency is not in us. It is not in all Christians, Muslims and Jews. There are many wonderful Christians out there who never accept turning their God into a celestial bitch. There are many wonderful Muslims who never accept turning their God into a celestial political whore. There are many wonderful Jews who never accept turning their God into a celestial real estate whore. The tendency is only in the villainous among Christians, Muslims and Jews. It is only in the projectionists.